Rep RoomForm Before Failure
Form Before Failure

How To Do the Plank

Someone shouted encouragement and people held the plank half a minute longer with no extra muscle activity at all. That says something about what this test measures.

Start here

A plank is you holding yourself off the floor on your forearms and toes, in a straight line, not moving.

It is the default core exercise everywhere, and the default way people measure it is time. How long can you hold it.

That measurement turns out to be shakier than it looks.

The encouragement experiment

Thirty physically active adults held a front plank under two randomised conditions: with verbal reinforcement and without. EMG was recorded and analysed for both amplitude and median frequency, using one-second windows and polynomial models, alongside execution time and perceived exertion.

With encouragement, people held on for a median of 125.9 seconds. Without it, 97.0 seconds. That is roughly 29 seconds longer, and the difference was significant.

And the muscle activity? No significant differences between conditions in EMG amplitude or median frequency, p above 0.05.

So the muscles were doing the same thing. The person simply tolerated it for longer because someone was talking to them.

That is worth sitting with. If your plank time jumps by 30 percent because of who is watching, then plank time is measuring your willingness to stay uncomfortable at least as much as it measures your core.

Thirty active adults in a single session, and the study was specifically about verbal reinforcement rather than about how to program planks.

Untrained people hold planks with their back

Thirty healthy people were split by training background: 15 trained, 15 untrained. Everyone held an isometric plank until they could not continue. EMG covered seven muscles: rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, erector spinae, gluteus maximus, gluteus medius and multifidus. Activity was split into three phases leading up to failure.

The untrained group showed significantly greater activation in the erector spinae, p equals 0.024, and the multifidus, p equals 0.027, than the trained group. Both of those are back muscles, not abdominals.

The study's title asks whether the plank is suitable for everyone. That result is the reason it asks.

If you are new to training, you may be holding your plank position substantially with your lower back extensors rather than with your abdominal wall. It looks like the same exercise from outside. Internally it is a different one.

The practical response is not to avoid planks. It is to keep them short and well positioned rather than chasing long holds, and to actively think about ribs down and glutes on, which is what stops the lower back doing the job.

Fifteen people per group, single session, healthy young adults.

How you breathe changes what contracts

Fifteen people with mild chronic non-specific low back pain performed two techniques in random order while ultrasound measured the thickness of the transversus abdominis, internal oblique and external oblique.

The two techniques were the abdominal drawing-in maneuver, the classic pull-your-navel-in cue, and forced expiration, which is simply breathing out hard.

The reason the study exists is that the drawing-in cue is hard to perform correctly, and people often compensate by contracting the obliques instead of the deep transversus abdominis. Forced expiration was proposed as a way to get the deep muscle working with less oblique compensation.

The practical carry-over: if you cannot feel your deep abdominal wall in a plank, try breathing out firmly rather than trying to suck your navel in. The breath does the work the cue struggles to.

This was 15 people with mild low back pain, tested on the techniques themselves rather than during a plank. Borrow the idea, not the numbers.

So how should you actually measure it

Not by the clock alone, given what the encouragement study found.

Better markers: can you keep your ribs down, can you keep your glutes engaged, does your lower back stay out of it, and does your hip position hold. When the hips sag or hike, the set is over regardless of what the timer says.

And if you are relatively untrained, short high-quality holds are more defensible than long ones, because the evidence suggests the longer it goes the more your back extensors are likely to be involved.

That last inference is mine, drawn from the trained-versus-untrained result. No study here tracked position quality over the duration of a hold.

How to actually do it

Forearms under your shoulders, elbows about shoulder width.

Feet about hip width. Wider is easier, narrower is harder.

Ribs down. This is the one that matters. Think about pulling your bottom ribs toward your hips rather than letting your chest sink.

Squeeze your glutes. That tilts your pelvis so your lower back stops arching, which is exactly the pattern the untrained group showed.

Breathe. Hard exhales if you cannot feel your deep abdominals working.

Hold a line from your head to your heels. No sagging hips, no hiking them into the air.

End the set when your hips move, not when the timer says so, and not when someone shouts louder.

The takeaway

Stop treating plank time as a core score. Encouragement alone added about 29 seconds with no measurable change in muscle activity, so the clock is partly measuring tolerance. If you are relatively untrained, be aware that back extensors carried significantly more of the work than in trained people, which is an argument for shorter, better-positioned holds instead of long ones. Ribs down, glutes squeezed, breathe out firmly if you cannot feel your deep abdominals, and end the set the moment your hips move.

Limits of this evidence

  • All three studies are small (30, 30 and 15 participants) and measured single sessions rather than training outcomes over time.
  • The verbal reinforcement study examined encouragement specifically; it does not establish how planks should be programmed or whether longer holds build more core strength.
  • The trained-versus-untrained comparison used 15 people per group of healthy young adults, so it does not cover older adults, people with back pain, or a range of training histories.
  • That study reports greater back extensor activation in untrained participants but does not establish that this causes harm.
  • The breathing study was conducted in people with mild chronic low back pain and tested the techniques in isolation, not during a plank, so applying it to plank execution is inference.
  • The suggestion that longer holds increasingly involve the back extensors is my inference from the trained-versus-untrained result; no source tracked position quality across a hold's duration.
  • No source measured injury outcomes.
  • Each claim rests on a single source with no independent replication checked. Treat the piece as provisional.
This piece rates evidence on a conservative ladder that tops out at Moderate. We never publish certainty we do not have. See how we rate